If realized, these capabilities have the potential to provide the naval services and joint force with a combat credible, risk worthy, stand-in force to meet the demands of the National Defense Strategy. David Berger’s planning guidance, the Marine Corps has focused its force-design efforts on new tactical capabilities and formations. Without addressing the major imbalances that have led to the service “ not organized, trained, equipped, or postured to meet the demands of the rapidly evolving future operating environment,” future commandants will likely find themselves in the same predicaments again and again. Setting the Marine Corps back on the right path first requires fixing the structural ways in which the service’s decisions are made and implemented within Headquarters Marine Corps. Unfortunately, redesigning the Corps is not enough, even if some blessed bovines are beheaded along the way. And both expressed their desire to fix this major national security issue, with the current commandant going so far as to explain that he is willing to kill the Corps’ “sacred cows” to do so. The last and current commandants of the Marine Corps have made this fact clear in public statements and official documents. “ has fully demonstrated the vital need for the existence of a strong force in readiness … The nation’s shock troops must be the most ready when the nation is generally least ready … to provide a balanced force in readiness for a naval campaign and, at the same time, a ground and air striking force ready to suppress or contain international disturbances short of large-scale war.”Īmerica’s 9-1-1 force is not ready to receive the call.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |